@inproceedings{KraussJascheSassmannshausenetal.2021,
  author    = {Veronika Krau{\"s} and Florian Jasche and Sheree May Sa{\"s}mannshausen and Alexander Boden and Thomas Ludwig},
  title     = {Research and Practice Recommendations for Mixed Reality Design – Different Perspectives from the Community},
  series = {27th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST ’21), December 8–10, 2021, Osaka, Japan},
  publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
  address   = {New York, NY, United States},
  isbn      = {978-1-4503-9092-7},
  doi       = {10.1145/3489849.3489876},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:1044-opus-58792},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Over the last decades, different kinds of design guides have been created to maintain consistency and usability in interactive system development. However, in the case of spatial applications, practitioners from research and industry either have difficulty finding them or perceive such guides as lacking relevance, practicability, and applicability. This paper presents the current state of scientific research and industry practice by investigating currently used design recommendations for mixed reality (MR) system development. We analyzed and compared 875 design recommendations for MR applications elicited from 89 scientific papers and documentation from six industry practitioners in a literature review. In doing so, we identified differences regarding four key topics: Focus on unique MR design challenges, abstraction regarding devices and ecosystems, level of detail and abstraction of content, and covered topics. Based on that,we contribute to the MR design research by providing three factors for perceived irrelevance and six main implications for design recommendations that are applicable in scientific and industry practice.},
  language  = {en}
}