@inproceedings{LaueKuehneGadatsch2009,
  author    = {Ralf Laue and Stefan K{\"u}hne and Andreas Gadatsch},
  title     = {Evaluating the Effect of Feedback on Syntactic Errors for Novice Modellers},
  series = {N{\"u}ttgens, Rump et al. (Hg.): EPK 2009: Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, 8. Workshop der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Informatik e.V. (GI) und Treffen ihres Arbeitskreises \"Gesch{\"a}ftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten (WI-EPK)\" Berlin, 26.-27. November 2009},
  publisher = {CEUR},
  pages     = {110 -- 117},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {In this paper, we present the results of a controlled human experiment where students in a business process modelling course had to model a business process from a case study as part of their coursework. One group could take advantage of the continuous validation feature that is implemented in the bflow modelling tool, i.e. they were provided with alerts about modelling errors. A control group had to create a model for the same case study without using continuous validation. The results of the experiment indicate that the presence of continuous validation indeed has had a positive effect on the number of syntactic errors in business process models.},
  language  = {en}
}