Refine
H-BRS Bibliography
- yes (24)
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Zentrum für Ethik und Verantwortung (ZEV) (24) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (13)
- Article (7)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (2)
- Report (2)
Keywords
- Liebe (2)
- Love (2)
- Polyamorie (2)
- Polyamory (2)
- Changes in communication (1)
- Consensus (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Entwicklungsziele /MDGs/SDGs (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Ethik (1)
Orešković and Porsdam Mann draw a distinction between ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ science. Whereas the latter involves rigorous and laborious adherence to the scientific method, the former represents the reality that much scientific work faces time pressures which at times force shortcuts. The distinction can be seen to operate in contemporary research into the coronavirus pandemic: whereas the development of vaccines and treatments usually requires years of meticulous laboratory work and several more years of clinical testing, the many millions suffering from the disease need a treatment now. However, by taking too many safeguards off the treatment discovery and testing pipelines, or by refusing to act in accordance with scientific advice, governments risk sacrificing the public’s trust not only in the government’s scientific bona fides but in the scientific process itself. This is a heavy price to pay, argue Orešković and Porsdam Mann, and point to evidence indicating that the success of Germany and Japan in combating COVID-19 can be traced to public trust in science and government, as well as scientifically-informed and respectful national leadership.
Any political phenomenon can only be properly understood in its broader con-text. Questions of international cooperation are thus necessarily framed by his-torical processes and relations of power. We therefore start our first discussion with an examination of the global ‘status quo’ and embed the topic of this pub-lication, ODA graduation, into the shifting world order, analysing current roles and settings in international relations and identifying changes in positions, sta-tus and categories. What are the overarching issues determining world politics and who are the old and the new actors driving them? What is the impact of these global shifts on international cooperation, especially development coop-eration? Of what relevance are roles, status and categories and what is the im-pact of changes in positions and relations? What challenges face multilateralism and what ways exist to maintain and renew strategic partnerships and shared values?
The UN Declaration on the Right to Development (UNDRTD) adopted in 1986 and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted in 2015 share a universal concept of development that refers both to individual and collective dimensions of prosperity and thus includes the rights of future generations.2 They thus offer a definition of the relationship between development and human rights that is very relevant for the 21st century. The core norm of the UNDRTD has been defined later as “the right of peoples and individuals to the constant improvement of their wellbeing and to a national and global enabling environment conducive to just, equitable, participatory and human-centred development respectful of all human rights”3.