Refine
H-BRS Bibliography
- yes (38)
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (38) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (16)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Conference Object (5)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (4)
- Contribution to a Periodical (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Book review (1)
Year of publication
Keywords
- Führung (3)
- Unternehmen (3)
- Neuroökonomik (2)
- Performance (2)
- Well-being (2)
- Accessibility (1)
- Arbeitspause (1)
- BGM Corona (1)
- BGM Homeoffice (1)
- Betriebliche Gesundheitspolitik (1)
- Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement Corona (1)
- Break (1)
- Cognitive processing (1)
- Digitales BGM Buch (1)
- Digitales Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement (1)
- Führungsstil (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Human capital (1)
- Information Systems (1)
- Neurophysiologie (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- Neurowissenschaften (1)
- Nurse (1)
- Occupational health management (1)
- Recovery (1)
- Rest (1)
- Review (1)
- Work break (1)
- audiovisual stimulation (1)
- basic human needs, evolution of behavior (1)
- basic needs (1)
- burnout (1)
- coaching (1)
- coaching framework (1)
- coaching psychology (1)
- experimental design (1)
- health education (1)
- human behavior (1)
- mental health (1)
- mood (1)
- motivation (1)
- neuro-cognitive performance (1)
- neuropsychotherapy (1)
- pause (1)
- performance measure (1)
- physical activity (1)
- physiological measure (1)
- prefrontal cortex (1)
- psychological needs (1)
- relaxation (1)
- rest break (1)
- self-report measure (1)
- subjective well-being (1)
- usability (1)
- work break (1)
- work engagement (1)
- workday breaks (1)
- workplace health promotion (1)
Wissenschaft trifft Praxis
(2017)
The case for basic human needs in coaching: A neuroscientific perspective - The SCOAP Coach Theory
(2014)
Describing the elephant: a foundational model of human needs, motivation, behaviour, and wellbeing
(2020)
Models of basic psychological needs have been present and popular in the academic and lay literature for more than a century yet reviews of needs models show an astonishing lack of consensus. This raises the question of what basic human psychological needs are and if this can be consolidated into a model or framework that can align previous research and empirical study. The authors argue that the lack of consensus arises from researchers describing parts of the proverbial elephant correctly but failing to describe the full elephant. Through redefining what human needs are and matching this to an evolutionary framework we can see broad consensus across needs models and neatly slot constructs and psychological and behavioural theories into this framework. This enables a descriptive model of drives, motives, and well-being that can be simply outlined but refined enough to do justice to the complexities of human behaviour. This also raises some issues of how subjective well-being is and should be measured. Further avenues of research and how to continue building this model and framework are proposed.