Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
Document Type
- Part of a Book (21)
- Article (19)
- Lecture (12)
- Conference Object (8)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (4)
- Other (2)
- Working Paper (2)
- Postdoctoral thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Year of publication
Keywords
- Deutschland (2)
- Flüchtlingshilfe (2)
- Germany (2)
- Integration (2)
- Islam (2)
- Asylbewerberunterkunft (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Climate Change Adaptation (1)
- Desecuritization (1)
This article analyzes how humanitarian and/or development organizations acting as intermediaries between scientists and vulnerable populations aim to make environmental changes visible while trying to meet local needs and demands for sustainable livelihoods. Based on an in-depth organizational case study in Southern Thailand, the research analyses the use of visualization tools to foster environmental knowledge and literacy while supporting both policymaking as well as citizen engagement. Drawing on insights from sociology of organizations, the study discusses the organizational reasons for the use of visualization tools, outlining the underlying coercive, mimetic and normative pressures that facilitate their proliferation in the context of environmental communication. The results show that both the participatory approach as well as the use of audiovisual and digital tools to communicate project goals and results have become indispensable and institutionalized tools in the organizational field of humanitarian and development aid. In this context, organizations have become intermediaries and translators between ‘climate risk’ scientists and ‘at risk’ people, thus, facilitating environmental communication. The results show that questions of trust and ownership of ideas play an important role in the context of livelihood related projects linked to climate change adaptation. In this context, not only does the style and content of communication, but also the relationship between the parties who communicate, have an impact upon the success or failure of managing options in climate change adaptation.
Communicating Climate Risks. A case study of the International Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement
(2015)
Migrationspolitik in Deutschland polarisiert derzeit wie kaum ein anderes Thema. Einen zentralen Kritikpunkt aus der menschenrechtlichen Perspektive stellen hierbei fehlende gesetzlich verbindliche und einheitliche Standards in der Unterbringung von geflüchteten Menschen in Deutschland dar. Das Ausbleiben verbindlicher bundesweiter Vorgaben hat weitreichende negative Folgen insbesondere für vulnerable Gruppen unter den geflüchteten Menschen, wie Frauen, Kinder, Senior:innen, chronisch Kranke oder LGBTQ+ Personen.
Im Zuge der Migrationsbewegung in den Jahren 2015 und 2016 hat die menschenwürdige Unterbringung von geflüchteten Menschen in Kommunen in Deutschland an Aufmerksamkeit gewonnen. Der Anstieg der Asylbewerber:innen in den Kommunen sowie die Bundesinitiative „Schutz von geflüchteten Menschen in Flüchtlingsunterkünften“ haben Veränderungen im Hinblick auf Schutzstandards in der kommunalen Unterbringung geflüchteter Menschen hervorgerufen. Der Artikel erklärt diese Veränderungen mittels einer akteurszentrierten organisationssoziologischen Herangehensweise. Grundlage sind empirische Forschungsergebnisse des Projektes „Organisational Perspectives on Human Security Standards for Refugees in Germany“ aus zwei deutschen Kommunen.