Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Refine
H-BRS Bibliography
- yes (6)
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Internationales Zentrum für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (IZNE) (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (6)
Year of publication
- 2021 (6) (remove)
Language
- English (6) (remove)
Keywords
- Kenya (2)
- Africa (1)
- Avian influenza (1)
- Comparative institutional analysis (1)
- Flood management (1)
- Insect diversity (1)
- Institutional change (1)
- Metabarcoding (1)
- Nachhaltige Entwicklung (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Nahrungspräferenzen (1)
- One health action (1)
- Pesticides (1)
- Rabies (1)
- Social Protection (1)
- Societal dialogues (1)
- Spatial analysis (1)
- Stakeholder analysis (1)
- Uncertainty (1)
- Verbraucherforschung (1)
- Verbraucherverhalten (1)
- consumer behaviour (1)
- consumer research (1)
- food preferences (1)
- informal institutions (1)
- local context (1)
- political economy (1)
- social protection (1)
- sustainability (1)
- sustainable development (1)
The article contributes to understanding the political economy of implementation of social protection programmes at local level. Current debates are dominated by technocratic arguments, emphasizing the lack of financial resources, technology or skills as major barriers for effective implementation. Describing how chiefs, assistant-chiefs and community elders are routinely at the centre stage of core implementation processes, including targeting, enrolment, delivery, monitoring, awareness and information, data collection or grievance and redress, this study on Kenya argues for the need to look more closely into the local political economy as an important mediating arena for implementing social policies. Implementation is heavily contingent upon the local social, political and institutional context that influences and shapes its outcomes. These processes are ambivalent involving multiple forms of interactions between ‘formal’ and ‘informal’ institutional structures, which may support initial policy objectives or induce policy outcomes substantially diverging from intended policy objectives.