303 Gesellschaftliche Prozesse
Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (37)
- Internationales Zentrum für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (IZNE) (25)
- Fachbereich Sozialpolitik und Soziale Sicherung (15)
- Institut für Soziale Innovationen (ISI) (10)
- Fachbereich Ingenieurwissenschaften und Kommunikation (3)
- Zentrum für Ethik und Verantwortung (ZEV) (2)
- Centrum für Entrepreneurship, Innovation und Mittelstand (CENTIM) (1)
- Fachbereich Angewandte Naturwissenschaften (1)
- Institut für Technik, Ressourcenschonung und Energieeffizienz (TREE) (1)
- Institut für Verbraucherinformatik (IVI) (1)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (45)
- Article (17)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (11)
- Conference Object (8)
- Working Paper (4)
- Conference Proceedings (2)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Periodical (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Report (1)
Year of publication
Keywords
- Nachhaltigkeit (5)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (3)
- Digitalisierung (3)
- Innovation (3)
- Agiles Management (2)
- Designprinzipien (2)
- Digitale Transformation (2)
- Dritter Sektor (2)
- Gemeingutmanagement (2)
- Genossenschaften (2)
- Hybrids (2)
- Kollektives Handeln (2)
- Kooperation (2)
- Organisationsentwicklung (2)
- Anthropocene (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Automatische Detektion (1)
- Begriff (1)
- Betriebswirtschaftslehre (1)
- Bihar (1)
- Bildung (1)
- Bio (1)
- Biodiversity (1)
- Bireysel refah etkileri (1)
- Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1)
- Chancengleichheit (1)
- Changes in communication (1)
- Chiapas (1)
- Composites (1)
- Consumer Online Behaviour (1)
- Consumption of natural resources (1)
- Controlling (1)
- Datenschutzrecht (1)
- Derivat (1)
- Desinformation (1)
- Diskurs (1)
- Domain (1)
- Doğal kaynak tüketimi (1)
- Ecological exploitation (1)
- Ekolojik sömürü (1)
- Europe (1)
- Europäische Bankenabgabe (1)
- Expert elicitation (1)
- FMSA (1)
- Fair Trade (1)
- Fairtrade (1)
- Fake News (1)
- Framing (1)
- Human lifestyle (1)
- Human livelihood (1)
- IOPVs (1)
- Individual prosperity effects (1)
- Innovationsmanagement (1)
- Interdisziplinäre Forschung (1)
- Internetökonomie (1)
- Komsumentenverhalten (1)
- Kreditinstitut (1)
- Kritik (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (1)
- Leitkultur (1)
- Local varieties (1)
- Maize varietal output (1)
- Malawi (1)
- Matematiksel çerçeve (1)
- Mathematical frame (1)
- Medien (1)
- Mitarbeiter (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit im Lebensmittelhandel (1)
- Nachhaltigkeitscontrolling (1)
- Nation (1)
- Patriotismus (1)
- Perceived adoption rate (1)
- Peren Teoremi (1)
- Peren Theorem (1)
- Politik (1)
- Produktlebenszyklus (1)
- Repräsentation (1)
- Ressourcenökonomie (1)
- Restrukturierungsfonds (1)
- Restrukturierungsfonds-Verordnung (1)
- Restrukturierungsgesetz (1)
- SRM (1)
- Seed access (1)
- Seed quality (1)
- Social cash transfers (1)
- Social entrepreneurship (1)
- Sozialer Wandel (1)
- Sozialstaat (1)
- Steuergerechtigkeit (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Sustainability in food retailing (1)
- Sustainable development (1)
- Umweltbezogenes Management (1)
- Unternehmen (1)
- Verfassung (1)
- Web Content Analysis (1)
- Web Mining (1)
- Wicked Problems (1)
- Wirtschaftsethik (1)
- Wirtschaftskrise (1)
- Zambia (1)
- agriculture (1)
- alternative urban food networks (1)
- attitude-behaviour-gap (1)
- behavioural economics (1)
- biodiversity (1)
- change agents (1)
- citizens' involvement (1)
- co-production (1)
- consumer decision models (1)
- consumption expenditure (1)
- crisis exercise (1)
- drivers (1)
- engage exchange model (1)
- ethical values (1)
- fake news and alternative facts (1)
- farmers (1)
- farmers’ drivers (1)
- food security (1)
- handprint (1)
- homo oeconomicus (1)
- impact (1)
- interdisciplinarity (1)
- land use (1)
- land use dilemma (1)
- land use trilemma (1)
- mixed method approach (1)
- mixed methods (1)
- multikulturelle Gesellschaft (1)
- nationale Identität (1)
- nature-protected areas (1)
- novel publishing models in science (1)
- odds-weighted regression (1)
- organic food (1)
- outbreak management (1)
- participation (1)
- politischer Wandel (1)
- propensity score matching (1)
- questionnaire (1)
- resilience (1)
- responsible consumer (1)
- risk communication (1)
- semi-structured questionnaire (1)
- social media (1)
- social media analysis (1)
- socio economic impact (1)
- stakeholder analysis (1)
- sustainability assessments (1)
- the need for open and critical dialogue (1)
- Ökologischer Fußabdruck (1)
- İnsani geçim (1)
Digitalisierung in zentralen Feldern der Sozialpolitik: Entwicklungstendenzen, Chancen und Risiken
(2022)
Der Impuls von Remi Maier-Rigaud behandelt die Einführung der europäischen Gesundheitsunion als Reaktion auf die begrenzten Handlungsmöglichkeiten der Europäischen Union (EU) im Bereich der Gesundheitspolitik während der Coronapandemie. Die Gesundheitsunion wurde geschaffen, um die koordinierte Reaktion auf grenzüberschreitende Gesundheitsgefahren zu verbessern. Maier-Riguad beleuchtet im Beitrag die Vorteile einer europäischen Gesundheitspolitik, betont jedoch, dass die Frage der ausreichenden Vorbereitung auf zukünftige Gesundheitskrisen offen bleibt.
Politische Ökonomie
(2023)
Twitchen als Kulturtechnik
(2023)
Die Maschine als Schöpferin
(2023)
This paper aims to assess farmers’ challenges in enhancing biodiversity. The so-called “trilemma” (WBGU 2021) of land use stems from the multiple demands made on land for the benefit of mitigating climate change, securing food, and maintaining biodiversity. Agriculture is accused of maladministration, causing soil contamination, animal cruelty, bee mortality, and climate change. However, farmers play a key role in overcoming upcoming sustainability challenges. While their supportive role is urgently needed, farmers find themselves caught between a “rock” and a ”hard place”. Consumers call for sustainable production and affordable food products without pesticide residues, demanding enough for all. Farmers are restricted by the wants and needs of consumers who are influenced by interest groups and exposed to interdependent direct and indirect influencing factors. They need to balance the scrutiny of the critical public as well as the regulatory control. In this paper, we collected and surveyed the data of farmers within or close to the 21 selected nature protected areas of the DINA (Diversity of Insects in Nature protected Areas) Project, using a mixed methods approach with a semi-structured questionnaire considering issues’ interdependencies and the complexity of today´s problems. The conflicts and obstacles faced by farmers were assessed. The results reflect the farmers’ willingness and the importance of receiving appreciation for implementing biodiversity measures. These results, complemented by a following quantitative study, are the basis for recommendations for policymakers and farmers in all German nature protected areas.
The aim of this master thesis was to probe the view of Bonn’s citizens on the smart city project of the German city. A literature review helped defining the smart city term and identifying the smart city concept that is mostly used in Germany. This can be summarized as an urban planning concept using information and communication technology to build citizen centric, sustainable cities. According to this, a smart city should include transparent communication and participation of its citizens. The websites and different publications of Bonn were researched to understand its smart city strategy and vision. This revealed inconsistencies. To resolve these inconsistencies, three representatives of the city were inter-viewed. Based on the knowledge gained up to this point, two groups of Bonn’s inhabitants discussed the Smart City Bonn and presented their perception of it. With the help of this methodology, the following results were obtained. Communication and participation of the city are in many cases in line with the current recommendations for a smart city. Bonn has apparently recognized the relevance of these aspects in theory but should also implement them more consistently in practice. Currently the city council publishes contradictory information and does not plan to incorporate the sight of Bonn’s citizens to develop the smart city strat-egy in the first place, as it is recommended in common literature.
The aim of this paper is to assess the objectives of farmers’ challenges in enhancing biodiversity. The so-called “trilemma” (WBGU 2021) of land use stems from the multiple demands made on land for the benefit of mitigating climate change, securing food and maintaining biodiversity. The agricultural sector is accused of maladministration: it is blamed for causing soil contamination, animal cruelty, bee mortality and climate change. That is why farmers are seen as key actors at all levels. They are, however, also key players when it comes to overcoming the problems of the future. Their supportive role is urgently needed, but farmers find themselves caught between a “rock” and a ”hard place”. Consumers are calling for sustainable, environmentally friendly production and inexpensive food products that do not contain pesticide residues, demanding enough food for all. Farmers are restricted by the wants and needs of consumers who are influenced by interest groups and are exposed to direct and indirect influencing factors and their interdependencies. They are also tasked with balancing the scrutiny of the critical public on the one hand, and the control exercised by eager authorities on the other.
As part of the DINA (Diversity of Insects in Nature protected Areas) project, a trans- and interdisciplinary research study, we collected and surveyed the data of farmers who are farming within or close to the 21 selected nature protected areas included in the DINA project. Data was collected as part of a mixed method approach using a semi-structured questionnaire. The methodological and strategic approach and interdependencies of issues demonstrate the complexity of today’s problems. To investigate this, we first used the data collection method using questionnaires with closed and open questions. The conflicts and obstacles farmers face were evaluated, and the results show farmers’ willingness and the importance of appreciation shown to farmers for implementation of biodiversity measures. The paper proposes some follow-up activities (quantitative study) to verify the objectives. The results will later lead to recommendations for policymakers and farmers in all German nature protected areas.