Refine
H-BRS Bibliography
- yes (30)
Departments, institutes and facilities
Document Type
- Conference Object (15)
- Article (5)
- Preprint (5)
- Report (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Year of publication
Keywords
- Quality diversity (7)
- Bayesian optimization (3)
- Autoencoder (2)
- Compositional Pattern Producing Networks (2)
- Evolutionary Computation (2)
- Evolutionary computation (2)
- Generative Models (2)
- Lattice Boltzmann Method (2)
- Optimization (2)
- cellular automata (2)
- parametric (2)
- AI usage in sports (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (1)
- Clustering (1)
- Co-creative processes (1)
- Computational Fluid Dynamics (1)
- Computational chemistry (1)
- Computational creativity (1)
- Computational fluid dynamics (1)
- Computational modeling (1)
- Dimensionality reduction (1)
- Divergent optimization (1)
- Domestic robotics (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Electric mobility (1)
- Evolutionary optimization (1)
- Feature Model (1)
- Fusion (1)
- Genetic algorithm (1)
- Hochleistungssport (1)
- Human-Computer Interaction (1)
- Informationsgewinnung (1)
- Informationsverarbeitung (1)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (1)
- Leistungsdiagnostik (1)
- Leistungssport (1)
- Lennard-Jones parameters (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Maximal covering location problem (1)
- Methodik (1)
- Modalities (1)
- Multi-Solution Optimization (1)
- Multi-objective (1)
- Multi-objective optimization (1)
- Multi-stage (1)
- Multimodal (1)
- Multimodal optimization (1)
- Object recognition (1)
- Phenotypic niching (1)
- Quality Diversity (1)
- SMPA loop (1)
- Single-objective (1)
- Software (1)
- Spielanalyse (1)
- Surrogate models (1)
- Surrogate-assistance (1)
- Synergetik (1)
- Trainingssteuerung (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Variational Autoencoder (1)
- Wettkampfanalyse (1)
- activation function (1)
- bagging (1)
- bloat (1)
- design process (1)
- designing air flow (1)
- dimensionality reduction (1)
- diversity (1)
- elite sports (1)
- encoding, representation (1)
- evolutionary illumination (1)
- explainable AI (1)
- feature discovery (1)
- force field (1)
- genetic neutrality (1)
- heterogeneous networks (1)
- ideation (1)
- local optimization (1)
- multi-objective optimization (1)
- multi-solution optimization (1)
- multimodal optimization (1)
- multiscale parameterization (1)
- neuroevolution (1)
- non-linear projection (1)
- objective function (1)
- phenotypic diversity (1)
- phenotypic feature (1)
- phenotypic niching (1)
- pre-optimization (1)
- prototype theory (1)
- quality-diversity (1)
- rds encoding (1)
- regression (1)
- representation (1)
- surrogate assisted phenotypic niching (1)
- surrogate modeling (1)
- surrogate models (1)
- weighting factors (1)
- wind nuisance (1)
- wind nuisance threshold (1)
This paper explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in elite sports. We approach the topic from two perspectives. Firstly, we provide a literature based overview of AI success stories in areas other than sports. We identified multiple approaches in the area of Machine Perception, Machine Learning and Modeling, Planning and Optimization as well as Interaction and Intervention, holding a potential for improving training and competition. Secondly, we discover the present status of AI use in elite sports. Therefore, in addition to another literature review, we interviewed leading sports scientist, which are closely connected to the main national service institute for elite sports in their countries. The analysis of this literature review and the interviews show that the most activity is carried out in the methodical categories of signal and image processing. However, projects in the field of modeling & planning have become increasingly popular within the last years. Based on these two perspectives, we extract deficits, issues and opportunities and summarize them in six key challenges faced by the sports analytics community. These challenges include data collection, controllability of an AI by the practitioners and explainability of AI results.
In optimization methods that return diverse solution sets, three interpretations of diversity can be distinguished: multi-objective optimization which searches diversity in objective space, multimodal optimization which tries spreading out the solutions in genetic space, and quality diversity which performs diversity maintenance in phenotypic space. We introduce niching methods that provide more flexibility to the analysis of diversity and a simple domain to compare and provide insights about the paradigms. We show that multiobjective optimization does not always produce much diversity, quality diversity is not sensitive to genetic neutrality and creates the most diverse set of solutions, and multimodal optimization produces higher fitness solutions. An autoencoder is used to discover phenotypic features automatically, producing an even more diverse solution set. Finally, we make recommendations about when to use which approach.
AErOmAt Abschlussbericht
(2020)
Das Projekt AErOmAt hatte zum Ziel, neue Methoden zu entwickeln, um einen erheblichen Teil aerodynamischer Simulationen bei rechenaufwändigen Optimierungsdomänen einzusparen. Die Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg (H-BRS) hat auf diesem Weg einen gesellschaftlich relevanten und gleichzeitig wirtschaftlich verwertbaren Beitrag zur Energieeffizienzforschung geleistet. Das Projekt führte außerdem zu einer schnelleren Integration der neuberufenen Antragsteller in die vorhandenen Forschungsstrukturen.
Computers can help us to trigger our intuition about how to solve a problem. But how does a computer take into account what a user wants and update these triggers? User preferences are hard to model as they are by nature vague, depend on the user’s background and are not always deterministic, changing depending on the context and process under which they were established. We pose that the process of preference discovery should be the object of interest in computer aided design or ideation. The process should be transparent, informative, interactive and intuitive. We formulate Hyper-Pref, a cyclic co-creative process between human and computer, which triggers the user’s intuition about what is possible and is updated according to what the user wants based on their decisions. We combine quality diversity algorithms, a divergent optimization method that can produce many, diverse solutions, with variational autoencoders to both model that diversity as well as the user’s preferences, discovering the preference hypervolume within large search spaces.