Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1089)
- Fachbereich Informatik (970)
- Fachbereich Angewandte Naturwissenschaften (577)
- Fachbereich Ingenieurwissenschaften und Kommunikation (512)
- Institut für funktionale Gen-Analytik (IFGA) (512)
- Fachbereich Sozialpolitik und Soziale Sicherung (359)
- Institut für Technik, Ressourcenschonung und Energieeffizienz (TREE) (352)
- Institut für Cyber Security & Privacy (ICSP) (281)
- Institute of Visual Computing (IVC) (272)
- Institut für Verbraucherinformatik (IVI) (217)
Document Type
- Article (1991)
- Conference Object (1646)
- Part of a Book (859)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (447)
- Report (147)
- Contribution to a Periodical (116)
- Doctoral Thesis (106)
- Preprint (71)
- Lecture (62)
- Working Paper (52)
Year of publication
Has Fulltext
- no (5749) (remove)
Keywords
- Lehrbuch (88)
- Deutschland (30)
- Nachhaltigkeit (26)
- Controlling (25)
- Unternehmen (23)
- Management (20)
- Betriebswirtschaftslehre (17)
- Prozessmanagement (15)
- Sozialversicherung (15)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (14)
An essential measure of autonomy in assistive service robots is adaptivity to the various contexts of human-oriented tasks, which are subject to subtle variations in task parameters that determine optimal behaviour. In this work, we propose an apprenticeship learning approach to achieving context-aware action generalization on the task of robot-to-human object hand-over. The procedure combines learning from demonstration and reinforcement learning: a robot first imitates a demonstrator’s execution of the task and then learns contextualized variants of the demonstrated action through experience. We use dynamic movement primitives as compact motion representations, and a model-based C-REPS algorithm for learning policies that can specify hand-over position, conditioned on context variables. Policies are learned using simulated task executions, before transferring them to the robot and evaluating emergent behaviours. We additionally conduct a user study involving participants assuming different postures and receiving an object from a robot, which executes hand-overs by either imitating a demonstrated motion, or adapting its motion to hand-over positions suggested by the learned policy. The results confirm the hypothesized improvements in the robot’s perceived behaviour when it is context-aware and adaptive, and provide useful insights that can inform future developments.
Machine learning-based solutions are frequently adapted in several applications that require big data in operations. The performance of a model that is deployed into operations is subject to degradation due to unanticipated changes in the flow of input data. Hence, monitoring data drift becomes essential to maintain the model’s desired performance. Based on the conducted review of the literature on drift detection, statistical hypothesis testing enables to investigate whether incoming data is drifting from training data. Because Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) have shown to be reliable distance measures between multivariate distributions in the literature review, both were selected from several existing techniques for experimentation. For the scope of this work, the image classification use case was experimented with using the Stream-51 dataset. Based on the results from different drift experiments, both MMD and KS showed high Area Under Curve values. However, KS exhibited faster performance than MMD with fewer false positives. Furthermore, the results showed that using the pre-trained ResNet-18 for feature extraction maintained the high performance of the experimented drift detectors. Furthermore, the results showed that the performance of the drift detectors highly depends on the sample sizes of the reference (training) data and the test data that flow into the pipeline’s monitor. Finally, the results also showed that if the test data is a mixture of drifting and non-drifting data, the performance of the drift detectors does not depend on how the drifting data are scattered with the non-drifting ones, but rather their amount in the test set