Refine
H-BRS Bibliography
- yes (13)
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Zentrum für Ethik und Verantwortung (ZEV) (13) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (13) (remove)
Keywords
The UN Declaration on the Right to Development (UNDRTD) adopted in 1986 and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted in 2015 share a universal concept of development that refers both to individual and collective dimensions of prosperity and thus includes the rights of future generations.2 They thus offer a definition of the relationship between development and human rights that is very relevant for the 21st century. The core norm of the UNDRTD has been defined later as “the right of peoples and individuals to the constant improvement of their wellbeing and to a national and global enabling environment conducive to just, equitable, participatory and human-centred development respectful of all human rights”3.
Dass die weitgehende kommerzielle Datenausspähung der großen Internetunternehmen nicht allein ein Problem der davon betroffenen Bürgerinnen und Bürger ist, sondern letztlich auch weitreichende gesellschaftliche Folgen hat, wurde mit dem Aufkommen des Rechtspopulismus in den USA, Brasilien und Europa zum Thema mindestens der Diskussion in Fachkreisen. Hass und Hetze im Netz, Fake News, politische Wahlwerbung und Manipulation in Social Media sind als Bedrohung für die freiheitlichen Demokratien westlicher Ausprägung unübersehbar geworden.
Orešković and Porsdam Mann draw a distinction between ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ science. Whereas the latter involves rigorous and laborious adherence to the scientific method, the former represents the reality that much scientific work faces time pressures which at times force shortcuts. The distinction can be seen to operate in contemporary research into the coronavirus pandemic: whereas the development of vaccines and treatments usually requires years of meticulous laboratory work and several more years of clinical testing, the many millions suffering from the disease need a treatment now. However, by taking too many safeguards off the treatment discovery and testing pipelines, or by refusing to act in accordance with scientific advice, governments risk sacrificing the public’s trust not only in the government’s scientific bona fides but in the scientific process itself. This is a heavy price to pay, argue Orešković and Porsdam Mann, and point to evidence indicating that the success of Germany and Japan in combating COVID-19 can be traced to public trust in science and government, as well as scientifically-informed and respectful national leadership.