Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
Document Type
- Conference Object (40)
- Article (25)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Year of publication
Keywords
- 3D user interface (7)
- virtual reality (6)
- haptics (4)
- Augmented Reality (3)
- 3D user interfaces (2)
- Augmented reality (2)
- Navigation (2)
- Perception (2)
- Virtual Reality (2)
- Virtual reality (2)
- guidance (2)
- human factors (2)
- interface design (2)
- leaning (2)
- multisensory cues (2)
- navigation (2)
- peripheral vision (2)
- spatial updating (2)
- vibration (2)
- 3D User Interface (1)
- 3D interfaces (1)
- 3D navigation (1)
- Active locomotion (1)
- Adaptive Control (1)
- Auditory Cueing (1)
- Camera selection (1)
- Camera view analysis (1)
- Challenges (1)
- Co-located work (1)
- Cognitive informatics (1)
- Cybersickness (1)
- Demonstration-based training (1)
- Entropy (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Fixed spatial data (1)
- Focus plus context (1)
- Games (1)
- Geospatial modeling (1)
- Group behavior analysis (1)
- Hand Guidance (1)
- Handheld Augmented Reality (1)
- Head Mounted Display (1)
- Head-mounted Display (1)
- Human computer interaction (1)
- Human factors (1)
- Immersion (1)
- Immersive analytics (1)
- Information interaction (1)
- Instruction design (1)
- Large display interaction (1)
- Large, high-resolution displays (1)
- Lighting simulation (1)
- Locomotion (1)
- Methodologies (1)
- Mobile spatial interaction (1)
- Motion Sickness (1)
- Multi-Modal Interaction (1)
- Multi-camera (1)
- Multilayer interaction (1)
- Multisensory cues (1)
- Navigation interface (1)
- Online 3D reconstruction (1)
- Out-of-view Objects (1)
- Performance (1)
- Presence (1)
- Proximity (1)
- Recommender systems (1)
- Tactile Feedback (1)
- Tactile feedback (1)
- Tiled displays (1)
- Touchscreen interaction (1)
- Travel Techniques (1)
- User Study (1)
- User engagement (1)
- User interface (1)
- User interfaces (1)
- VR (1)
- View selection (1)
- Visual Cueing (1)
- Visual Discrimination (1)
- Visualization (1)
- adaptive trigger (1)
- audio-tactile feedback (1)
- augmented, and virtual realities (1)
- back-of-device interaction (1)
- bass-shaker (1)
- body-centric cues (1)
- collaboration (1)
- collision (1)
- controller design (1)
- cybersickness (1)
- depth perception (1)
- embodied interfaces (1)
- flying (1)
- full-body interface (1)
- gaming (1)
- hand guidance (1)
- haptic feedback (1)
- haptic interfaces (1)
- human computer interaction (1)
- human-centric lighting (1)
- immersion (1)
- immersive systems (1)
- information display methods (1)
- interaction techniques (1)
- leaning, self-motion perception (1)
- leaning-based interfaces (1)
- locomotion (1)
- locomotion interface (1)
- mobile applications (1)
- mobile projection (1)
- motion cueing (1)
- motion sickness (1)
- multi-layer display (1)
- multisensory interface (1)
- natural user interface (1)
- navigational search (1)
- pen interaction (1)
- peripheral visual field (1)
- projection based systems (1)
- proxemics (1)
- psychophysics (1)
- robotics (1)
- see-through head-mounted displays (1)
- semi-continuous locomotion (1)
- sensemaking (1)
- short-term memory (1)
- situation awareness (1)
- spatial augmented reality (1)
- spatial orientation (1)
- spectral rendering (1)
- stereoscopic vision (1)
- surface textures (1)
- teleportation (1)
- telepresence (1)
- travel techniques (1)
- user engagement (1)
- user study (1)
- vection (1)
- view management (1)
- virtual environments (1)
- virtual locomotion (1)
- visuohaptic feedback (1)
- weight perception (1)
- whole-body interface (1)
- zooming interface (1)
- zooming interfaces (1)
The study of locomotion in virtual environments is a diverse and rewarding research area. Yet, creating effective and intuitive locomotion techniques is challenging, especially when users cannot move around freely. While using handheld input devices for navigation may often be good enough, it does not match our natural experience of motion in the real world. Frequently, there are strong arguments for supporting body-centered self-motion cues as they may improve orientation and spatial judgments, and reduce motion sickness. Yet, how these cues can be introduced while the user is not moving around physically is not well understood. Actuated solutions such as motion platforms can be an option, but they are expensive and difficult to maintain. Alternatively, within this article we focus on the effect of upper-body tilt while users are seated, as previous work has indicated positive effects on self-motion perception. We report on two studies that investigated the effects of static and dynamic upper body leaning on perceived distances traveled and self-motion perception (vection). Static leaning (i.e., keeping a constant forward torso inclination) had a positive effect on self-motion, while dynamic torso leaning showed mixed results. We discuss these results and identify further steps necessary to design improved embodied locomotion control techniques that do not require actuated motion platforms.
Evaluation of a Multi-Layer 2.5D display in comparison to conventional 3D stereoscopic glasses
(2020)
In this paper we propose and evaluate a custom-build projection-based multilayer 2.5D display, consisting of three layers of images, and compare performance to a stereoscopic 3D display. Stereoscopic vision can increase the involvement and enhance game experience, however may induce possible side effects, e.g. motion sickness and simulator sickness. To overcome the disadvantage of multiple discrete depths, in our system perspective rendering and head-tracking is used. A study was performed to evaluate this display with 20 participants playing custom-designed games. The results indicated that the multi-layer display caused fewer side effects than the stereoscopic display and provided good usability. The participants also stated a better or equal spatial perception, while the cognitive load stayed the same.
Advances in computer graphics enable us to create digital images of astonishing complexity and realism. However, processing resources are still a limiting factor. Hence, many costly but desirable aspects of realism are often not accounted for, including global illumination, accurate depth of field and motion blur, spectral effects, etc. especially in real‐time rendering. At the same time, there is a strong trend towards more pixels per display due to larger displays, higher pixel densities or larger fields of view. Further observable trends in current display technology include more bits per pixel (high dynamic range, wider color gamut/fidelity), increasing refresh rates (better motion depiction), and an increasing number of displayed views per pixel (stereo, multi‐view, all the way to holographic or lightfield displays). These developments cause significant unsolved technical challenges due to aspects such as limited compute power and bandwidth. Fortunately, the human visual system has certain limitations, which mean that providing the highest possible visual quality is not always necessary. In this report, we present the key research and models that exploit the limitations of perception to tackle visual quality and workload alike. Moreover, we present the open problems and promising future research targeting the question of how we can minimize the effort to compute and display only the necessary pixels while still offering a user full visual experience.