Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
Document Type
- Conference Object (20)
- Article (6)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (1)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Year of publication
Has Fulltext
- no (30) (remove)
Keywords
- Peer-to-Peer (3)
- Self-Driving Cars (3)
- Autonomous Driving (2)
- Blockchain (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Public Transport (2)
- Shared Autonomous Vehicles (2)
- Shared autonomous vehicles (2)
- Sharing Economy (2)
- Sustainability (2)
The alternative use of travel time is one of the widely discussed benefits of driverless cars. We therefore conducted 14 co-design sessions to examine how people manage their time, to determine how they perceive the value of time in driverless cars and to derive design implications. Our findings suggest that driverless mobility will affect both people’s use of travel time as well as their time management in general. The participants repeatedly stated the desire of completing tasks while traveling to save time for activities that are normally neglected in their everyday life. Using travel time efficiently requires using car space efficiently, too. We found out that the design concept of tiny houses could serve as common design pattern to deal with the limited space within cars and support diverse needs.
The megatrends towards both a digital and a usership economy have changed entire markets in the past and will continue to do so over the next decades. In this work, we outline what this change means for possible futures of the mobility sector, taking the combination of trends in both economies into account. Using a sys-tematic, scenario-based trend analysis, we draft four general future scenarios and adapt the two most relevant scenarios to the automotive sector. Our findings show that combing the trends from both economies provides new insights that have often been neglected in literature because of an isolated view on digital technology only. However, service concepts such as self-driving car sharing or self-driving taxis have a great impact at various levels including microeconomic (e.g., service and product design, business models) and macroeconomic (e.g., with regard to ecological, economical, and social impacts). We give a brief outline of these issues and show which business mo dels could be successful in the most likely future scenarios, before we frame strategic implications for today’s automobile manufacturers.
Who do you trust: Peers or Technology? A conjoint analysis about computational reputation mechanisms
(2020)
Peer-to-peer sharing platforms are taking over an increasingly important role in the platform economy due to their sustainable business model. By sharing private goods and services, the challenge arises to build trust between peers online mostly without any kind of physical presence. Peer rating has been proven as an important mechanism. In this paper, we explore the concept called Trust Score, a computational rating mechanism adopted from car telematics, which can play a similar role in carsharing. For this purpose, we conducted a conjoint analysis where 77 car owners chose between fictitious user profiles. Our results show that in our experiment the telemetric-based score slightly outperforms the peer rating in the decision process, while the participants perceived the peer rating more helpful in retrospect. Further, we discuss potential benefits with regard to existing shortcomings of user rating, but also various concerns that should be considered in concepts like telemetric-based reputation mechanism that supplements existing trust factors such as user ratings.
Dieser Artikel stützt sich auf das vom 13.10.2015 bis 12.01.2016 gemeinsam durchgeführten Praxisprojekt von ORBIT und der Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg. Thema des Projekts waren die Methodenevaluation und Automatisierung von Auswertungsprozessen. Speziell ging es um die Überprüfung der von ORBIT entwickelten Methodik zur Anforderungsanalyse und Standortbestimmung – dem ORBIT-Navigator.