Refine
H-BRS Bibliography
- yes (20) (remove)
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Institut für Verbraucherinformatik (IVI) (20) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Object (10)
- Article (5)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Year of publication
- 2023 (20) (remove)
Keywords
- Digital Sovereignty (2)
- Public Transport (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Verbraucherinformatik (2)
- AI-Systems (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Alexa (1)
- Attention mechanism (1)
- Beratung (1)
- Black-box models (1)
- Car Telematics (1)
- Co-performance (1)
- Communication breakdown (1)
- Conceptual model (1)
- Consumer Informatics (1)
- Consumer protection (1)
- Consumption (1)
- Conversational user interfaces (1)
- Curse of dimensionality (1)
- Digitaler Verbraucherschutz (1)
- Electric micromobility (1)
- Embodied knowledge (1)
- Empfehlungssystem (1)
- Empfehlungssysteme (1)
- Empirical Study (1)
- Explanatory dialogues (1)
- Fake review cues (1)
- Fake review detection (1)
- Food literacy (1)
- Hilfsangebote (1)
- Human autonomy (1)
- Human computer interaction (HCI) (1)
- Human review fraud detection (1)
- Human-centered computing (1)
- Human-food interaction (1)
- Human–Food Interaction (1)
- Individual Empowerment (1)
- Interpretability (1)
- Konsum (1)
- Last mile problem (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Ministerium (1)
- Mixed / augmented reality (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Modal Shift (1)
- Model surrogation (1)
- NLP (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Onlinebetrug (1)
- Opinion scam (1)
- P2P carsharing (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politikberatung (1)
- Practice Theory (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Reputation systems (1)
- Review scam (1)
- Risk Perception (1)
- Sachverständigenrat (1)
- Scoring (1)
- Semantic representation (1)
- Service expansion (1)
- Social practices (1)
- Soziale Praktiken (1)
- Taste (1)
- Textual entailment (1)
- Trust (1)
- User-perspective (1)
- Users’ repair strategies (1)
- Verbrauch (1)
- Viktimologie (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
- Voice Assistants (1)
- Voice assistant (1)
- Wahrnehmung (1)
- Wissenschaftler (1)
- Wissenstransfer (1)
- Word embedding (1)
- democratization (1)
- ethnography (1)
- explainable AI (1)
- food waste (1)
- multi-sensory (1)
- recommender systems (1)
- smart heating system (1)
- user interface (1)
- user-centered AI (1)
- wine (1)
- Öffentlichkeit (1)
AI systems pose unknown challenges for designers, policymakers, and users which aggravates the assessment of potential harms and outcomes. Although understanding risks is a requirement for building trust in technology, users are often excluded from legal assessments and explanations of AI hazards. To address this issue we conducted three focus groups with 18 participants in total and discussed the European proposal for a legal framework for AI. Based on this, we aim to build a (conceptual) model that guides policymakers, designers, and researchers in understanding users’ risk perception of AI systems. In this paper, we provide selected examples based on our preliminary results. Moreover, we argue for the benefits of such a perspective.
Background
Consumers rely heavily on online user reviews when shopping online and cybercriminals produce fake reviews to manipulate consumer opinion. Much prior research focuses on the automated detection of these fake reviews, which are far from perfect. Therefore, consumers must be able to detect fake reviews on their own. In this study we survey the research examining how consumers detect fake reviews online.
Methods
We conducted a systematic literature review over the research on fake review detection from the consumer-perspective. We included academic literature giving new empirical data. We provide a narrative synthesis comparing the theories, methods and outcomes used across studies to identify how consumers detect fake reviews online.
Results
We found only 15 articles that met our inclusion criteria. We classify the most often used cues identified into five categories which were (1) review characteristics (2) textual characteristics (3) reviewer characteristics (4) seller characteristics and (5) characteristics of the platform where the review is displayed.
Discussion
We find that theory is applied inconsistently across studies and that cues to deception are often identified in isolation without any unifying theoretical framework. Consequently, we discuss how such a theoretical framework could be developed.
There has been a growing interest in taste research in the HCI and CSCW communities. However, the focus is more on stimulating the senses, while the socio-cultural aspects have received less attention. However, individual taste perception is mediated through social interaction and collective negotiation and is not only dependent on physical stimulation. Therefore, we study the digital mediation of taste by drawing on ethnographic research of four online wine tastings and one self-organized event. Hence, we investigated the materials, associated meanings, competences, procedures, and engagements that shaped the performative character of tasting practices. We illustrate how the tastings are built around the taste-making process and how online contexts differ in providing a more diverse and distributed environment. We then explore the implications of our findings for the further mediation of taste as a social and democratized phenomenon through online interaction.
Western consumption patterns are strongly associated with environmental pollution and climate change, which challenges us with transforming our society and consumption towards a sustainable future. This thesis takes up this challenge and aims to contribute to this debate at the intersection of ICT artifacts and social practices through the examples of food and mobility consumption. The social practice lens is employed as an alternative to the predominant persuasive or motivational lens of design in the respective consumption domains. Against this background, this thesis first presents three research papers that contribute to a broader understanding of dynamic practices and their transformation towards a sustainable stable state. The following research takes up these sections' empirical results that more intensely focus on the appropriation of materials and infrastructures utilizing Recommender Systems. Given this approach, this thesis contributes to three fields - practice-based Computing, Recommender Systems, and Consumer Informatics.