Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Institut für Verbraucherinformatik (IVI) (134) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Object (134) (remove)
Year of publication
Keywords
- User Experience (6)
- Eco-Feedback (4)
- ICT (4)
- Smart Home (4)
- Sustainability (4)
- Sustainable Interaction Design (4)
- Dementia (3)
- Peer-to-Peer (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Public Transport (3)
- Wizard of Oz (3)
- Workplace (3)
- usability (3)
- Adoption (2)
- Appropriation (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Augmented Reality (2)
- Autonomous Driving (2)
- Blockchain (2)
- Claim personal data (2)
- Data takeout (2)
- Design (2)
- Digital Sovereignty (2)
- Exergame (2)
- Food (2)
- GDPR (2)
- Information Systems (2)
- Kompetenz (2)
- Living Lab (2)
- Machine Learning (2)
- Mobility (2)
- Organisation (2)
- Organizational Culture (2)
- Qualitative Study (2)
- Risk Perception (2)
- Self-Driving Cars (2)
- Service Design (2)
- Shared Autonomous Vehicles (2)
- Shared autonomous vehicles (2)
- Trust (2)
- Usable Privacy (2)
- User Acceptance (2)
- User-Centered Design (2)
- Verbraucherinformatik (2)
- appropriation (2)
- caregivers (2)
- co-design (2)
- end user development (2)
- interaction design (2)
- participatory design (2)
- prototyping (2)
- sustainable mobility (2)
- AI-Systems (1)
- AR design (1)
- AR development (1)
- AR/VR (1)
- Accessibility (1)
- Adoption Factors (1)
- Advances in Design Science Research (1)
- Alexa (1)
- Alternde Gesellschaft (1)
- Aneignungsstudie (1)
- Articulation Work (1)
- Attention mechanism (1)
- Automotive UI (1)
- Bayesian Hierarchical Model (1)
- Bewegungsmotivation (1)
- Biometric data (1)
- Black-box models (1)
- Business Models (1)
- Car Interior Design (1)
- Car Management (1)
- Care (1)
- Caregiver (1)
- Carsharing (1)
- Case-Study (1)
- Co-Design (1)
- Cognitive processing (1)
- Collaboration and e-Services (1)
- Communication breakdown (1)
- Community (1)
- Community of Practice (1)
- Computer Support (1)
- Conceptual model (1)
- Connected Car (1)
- Connected Car Services (1)
- Constructionism (1)
- Consumer Informatics (1)
- Consumer protection (1)
- Consumption feedback (1)
- Context-awareness (1)
- Conversational user interfaces (1)
- Cooperative Work (1)
- Curse of dimensionality (1)
- DSGVO (1)
- Data Integration (1)
- Data literacy (1)
- Data visualization (1)
- Datenschutz (1)
- Datenschutzerklärungen (1)
- Design Probe (1)
- Design Recommendations (1)
- Design Theory and Practice (1)
- Design-Fiction (1)
- Digital Receipt (1)
- Digitaler Konsum (1)
- Distribute Software Development (1)
- Domestic Technology (1)
- Driving Simulator (1)
- E-Business (1)
- EPCIS (Electronic Product Code Information Services) (1)
- Economics (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Electric micromobility (1)
- Empirical Study (1)
- Engaging Experience (1)
- Enterprise Engineering (1)
- Enterprise Information Systems (1)
- Ethnographic Research (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Experten (1)
- Explanatory dialogues (1)
- Folk theories (1)
- Food Practices (1)
- Food Retail (1)
- Fully Autonomous Driving (1)
- Future Work (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Global Software Development (1)
- Grassroots (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- HCI (1)
- HFI (1)
- Hauswirtschaft (1)
- Hems (1)
- Home energy management system (1)
- Human Factors (1)
- Human Food Interaction (1)
- Human autonomy (1)
- Human computer interaction (1)
- Human computer interaction (HCI) (1)
- Human-Food-Interaction (1)
- Human-Robot Collaboration (1)
- Human-centered computing (1)
- Human-robot interaction (1)
- IIoT (Industrial Internet of Things) (1)
- IT-CMF (1)
- Impaired (1)
- Individual Empowerment (1)
- Indoor-positioning (1)
- Integrated Household Information System (1)
- Integration Platform as a Service (1)
- Intelligence Amplification (1)
- Intelligence Augmentation (1)
- Intelligent Process Automation (1)
- Interactive Artifacts (1)
- Interpretability (1)
- Interview (1)
- Invisible AI (1)
- IoT (1)
- Jobs (1)
- Last mile problem (1)
- Learning (1)
- Learning Environments (1)
- Lebensmittelindustrie (1)
- Legal Aspects (1)
- Legal Design (1)
- Living Labs (1)
- MR (1)
- Management (1)
- Marketplaces (1)
- Mental models (1)
- Methods (1)
- Misconception (1)
- Mittelstand (1)
- Mixed / augmented reality (1)
- Mixed Reality (1)
- Mixed-methods (1)
- Modal Shift (1)
- Model surrogation (1)
- Multimodal Mobility (1)
- NLP (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Negotiation of Taste (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- Nutzerakzeptanz (1)
- Observation (1)
- Organisationsentwicklung (1)
- Organization Theory (1)
- Participatory Design (1)
- Participatory Design Approach (1)
- Partworth Utilities (1)
- Passengers (1)
- Perceived AI (1)
- Performance (1)
- Persuasive Systeme (1)
- Platform economy (1)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Theory (1)
- Privacy Awareness (1)
- Privatsphäre (1)
- Qualitative research (1)
- Recommender Systems (1)
- Relative Added Value (1)
- Relativer Mehrwert (1)
- Remote Work (1)
- Repeat Purchase Recommendations (1)
- Research Trajectories (1)
- Research through Design (1)
- Robo-taxi (1)
- Robotic Process Automation (1)
- Robots (1)
- Scan and Go (1)
- Second Cockpit (1)
- Second Screen (1)
- Selbstfahrende Autos (1)
- Self-checkout (1)
- Self-driving (1)
- Self-service (1)
- Semantic representation (1)
- Sensorbasierte Systeme (1)
- Service robot (1)
- Sharing Economy (1)
- Shopping Experience (1)
- Smart Contracts (1)
- Social Capital (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social learning (1)
- Social sustainability (1)
- Software as a Service (1)
- Stakeholder-Analyse (1)
- Supply Chain Management (1)
- Survey (1)
- Sustainable HCI (1)
- Taste (1)
- Taxi (1)
- Teleoperation (1)
- Textual entailment (1)
- Traceability (1)
- Transportation (1)
- Travel Mode Choice (1)
- UUX-Praxis (1)
- Ubiquity (1)
- Unattended Train Operation (1)
- Usability (1)
- User Experience (1)
- User Interface Design (1)
- User Requirements (1)
- User studies (1)
- Users’ repair strategies (1)
- Vegan (1)
- Verbraucherforschung (1)
- Verification systems (1)
- Verkehrsmittelwahl (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
- Voice Assistants (1)
- Voice assistant (1)
- Voight-Kampff test (1)
- Web-Tracking (1)
- Well-being (1)
- Wissensaustausch (1)
- Word embedding (1)
- XR (1)
- Zweckbindung (1)
- Zweckspezifizierung (1)
- accessibility information and communication technology (1)
- adl (1)
- augmented reality (1)
- authoring (1)
- authoring tools (1)
- autonomous driving (1)
- autonomous systems (1)
- breakdowns (1)
- car sharing (1)
- carsharing (1)
- computer system (1)
- connected car (1)
- consumer informatics (1)
- critical consumerism (1)
- culture of participation (1)
- data literacy (1)
- data science (1)
- data science canvas (1)
- decision support system (1)
- dementia (1)
- demographic transition (1)
- design (1)
- design case study (1)
- digital fabrication (1)
- digital receipt (1)
- ethics (1)
- evolutionary development (1)
- exergame (1)
- exergames (1)
- explainable AI (1)
- feature selection (1)
- field study (1)
- food consumption (1)
- hardware engineering (1)
- healthcare (1)
- interface design (1)
- knowledge management (1)
- machine learning (1)
- maker communities (1)
- memories (1)
- mixed reality (1)
- mobility intelligence (1)
- nostalgia (1)
- practitioners (1)
- prosumption (1)
- qualitative research methods (1)
- quality of life (1)
- reCAPTCHA (1)
- rebound effects (1)
- recommender systems (1)
- relatives (1)
- remembering (1)
- shared mobility (1)
- sharing (1)
- smart heating system (1)
- social interactions (1)
- social robots (1)
- social support (1)
- software engineering (1)
- storytelling (1)
- sustainability (1)
- technological platform (1)
- thermal comfort modelling (1)
- travel mode choice (1)
- universal design (1)
- usable privacy (1)
- user interface (1)
- user study (1)
- user-centered AI (1)
- virtual reality, XR (1)
- voice interaction (1)
In 1991 the researchers at the center for the Learning Sciences of Carnegie Mellon University were confronted with the confusing question of “where is AI” from the users, who were interacting with AI but did not realize it. Three decades of research and we are still facing the same issue with the AItechnology users. In the lack of users’ awareness and mutual understanding of AI-enabled systems between designers and users, informal theories of the users about how a system works (“Folk theories”) become inevitable but can lead to misconceptions and ineffective interactions. To shape appropriate mental models of AI-based systems, explainable AI has been suggested by AI practitioners. However, a profound understanding of the current users’ perception of AI is still missing. In this study, we introduce the term “Perceived AI” as “AI defined from the perspective of its users”. We then present our preliminary results from deep-interviews with 50 AItechnology users, which provide a framework for our future research approach towards a better understanding of PAI and users’ folk theories.
For most people, using their body to authenticate their identity is an integral part of daily life. From our fingerprints to our facial features, our physical characteristics store the information that identifies us as "us." This biometric information is becoming increasingly vital to the way we access and use technology. As more and more platform operators struggle with traffic from malicious bots on their servers, the burden of proof is on users, only this time they have to prove their very humanity and there is no court or jury to judge, but an invisible algorithmic system. In this paper, we critique the invisibilization of artificial intelligence policing. We argue that this practice obfuscates the underlying process of biometric verification. As a result, the new "invisible" tests leave no room for the user to question whether the process of questioning is even fair or ethical. We challenge this thesis by offering a juxtaposition with the science fiction imagining of the Turing test in Blade Runner to reevaluate the ethical grounds for reverse Turing tests, and we urge the research community to pursue alternative routes of bot identification that are more transparent and responsive.
Technological objects present themselves as necessary, only to become obsolete faster than ever before. This phenomenon has led to a population that experiences a plethora of technological objects and interfaces as they age, which become associated with certain stages of life and disappear thereafter. Noting the expanding body of literature within HCI about appropriation, our work pinpoints an area that needs more attention, “outdated technologies.” In other words, we assert that design practices can profit as much from imaginaries of the future as they can from reassessing artefacts from the past in a critical way. In a two-week fieldwork with 37 HCI students, we gathered an international collection of nostalgic devices from 14 different countries to investigate what memories people still have of older technologies and the ways in which these memories reveal normative and accidental use of technological objects. We found that participants primarily remembered older technologies with positive connotations and shared memories of how they had adapted and appropriated these technologies, rather than normative uses. We refer to this phenomenon as nostalgic reminiscence. In the future, we would like to develop this concept further by discussing how nostalgic reminiscence can be operationalized to stimulate speculative design in the present.
When dialogues with voice assistants (VAs) fall apart, users often become confused or even frustrated. To address these issues and related privacy concerns, Amazon recently introduced a feature allowing Alexa users to inquire about why it behaved in a certain way. But how do users perceive this new feature? In this paper, we present preliminary results from research conducted as part of a three-year project involving 33 German households. This project utilized interviews, fieldwork, and co-design workshops to identify common unexpected behaviors of VAs, as well as users’ needs and expectations for explanations. Our findings show that, contrary to its intended purpose, the new feature actually exacerbates user confusion and frustration instead of clarifying Alexa's behavior. We argue that such voice interactions should be characterized as explanatory dialogs that account for VA’s unexpected behavior by providing interpretable information and prompting users to take action to improve their current and future interactions.
Taste is a complex phenomenon that depends on the individual experience and is a matter of collective negotiation and mediation. On the contrary, it is uncommon to include taste and its many facets in everyday design, particularly online shopping for fresh food products. To realize this unused potential, we conducted two Co-Design workshops. Based on the participants’ results in the workshops, we prototyped and evaluated a click-dummy smart-phone app to explore consumers’ needs for digital taste depiction. We found that emphasizing the natural qualities of food products, external reviews, and personalizing features lead to a reflection on the individual taste experience. The self-reflection through our design enables consumers to develop their taste competencies and thus strengthen their autonomy in decision-making. Ultimately, exploring taste as a social experience adds to a broader understanding of taste beyond a sensory phenomenon.