Refine
Departments, institutes and facilities
- Fachbereich Informatik (76)
- Fachbereich Angewandte Naturwissenschaften (49)
- Fachbereich Ingenieurwissenschaften und Kommunikation (37)
- Institut für Technik, Ressourcenschonung und Energieeffizienz (TREE) (36)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (23)
- Institut für funktionale Gen-Analytik (IFGA) (19)
- Institut für Verbraucherinformatik (IVI) (18)
- Institute of Visual Computing (IVC) (18)
- Graduierteninstitut (11)
- Institut für Cyber Security & Privacy (ICSP) (11)
Document Type
- Article (94)
- Conference Object (65)
- Preprint (18)
- Doctoral Thesis (12)
- Part of a Book (10)
- Research Data (5)
- Report (4)
- Book (monograph, edited volume) (3)
- Contribution to a Periodical (2)
- Master's Thesis (2)
Year of publication
- 2020 (217) (remove)
Language
- English (217) (remove)
Keywords
- Inborn error of metabolism (3)
- Organic aciduria (3)
- Quality diversity (3)
- Shared autonomous vehicles (3)
- post-buckling (3)
- ARIMA (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Autoencoder (2)
- Automatic Short Answer Grading (2)
- Bayesian optimization (2)
YAWL (Yet Another Workflow Language) is an open source Business Process Management System, first released in 2003. YAWL grew out of a university research environment to become a unique system that has been deployed worldwide as a laboratory environment for research in Business Process Management and as a productive system in other scientific domains.
Who do you trust: Peers or Technology? A conjoint analysis about computational reputation mechanisms
(2020)
Peer-to-peer sharing platforms are taking over an increasingly important role in the platform economy due to their sustainable business model. By sharing private goods and services, the challenge arises to build trust between peers online mostly without any kind of physical presence. Peer rating has been proven as an important mechanism. In this paper, we explore the concept called Trust Score, a computational rating mechanism adopted from car telematics, which can play a similar role in carsharing. For this purpose, we conducted a conjoint analysis where 77 car owners chose between fictitious user profiles. Our results show that in our experiment the telemetric-based score slightly outperforms the peer rating in the decision process, while the participants perceived the peer rating more helpful in retrospect. Further, we discuss potential benefits with regard to existing shortcomings of user rating, but also various concerns that should be considered in concepts like telemetric-based reputation mechanism that supplements existing trust factors such as user ratings.
This paper aspires to develop a deeper understanding of the sharing/collaborative/platform economy, and in particular of the technical mechanisms upon which the digital platforms supporting it are built. In surveying the research literature, the paper identifies a gap between studies from economical, social or socio-technical angles, and presentations of detailed technical solutions. Most cases study larger, ‘monotechnological’ platforms, rather than local platforms that lend components from several technologies. Almost no literature takes a design perspective. Rooted in Sharing & Caring, an EU COST Action (network), the paper presents work to systematically map out functionalities across domains of the sharing economy. The 145 technical mechanisms we collected illustrate how most platforms are depending on a limited number of functionalities that lack in terms of holding communities together. The paper points to the necessity of a better terminology and concludes by discussing challenges and opportunities for the design of future and more inclusive platforms.